3
2013
Leadership and Change
Dealing with and leading change is possibly one of the most challenging tasks a leader faces. The leadership of change is made difficult because organizations have developed a culture to eliminate variation; to standardize processes— to resist the forces of change that tend to disrupt processes and create new and different ones. If history of change is the judge, most organizations fail to change when they should, and those who do try, most also fail to meet their desired results.
Last November, both the Harvard Business Review and Fast Company magazines had feature articles on the leadership of change. The Fast Company (http://www.fastcompany.com/3001734/secrets-generation-flux) article focused on individual leaders that the author, Editor Robert Safian, has labeled the “Flux Leader;” members of “Generation Flux.” In general, members of this generation and its leaders “characteristics are clear: an embrace of adaptability and flexibility; an openness to learning from anywhere; decisiveness tempered by the knowledge that business life today can shift radically” in very short periods of time. Safian points out that, “Accepted models for success are proving vulnerable, and pressure is building on giants like GE and Nokia, as their historic advantages of scale and efficiency run up against the benefits of agility and quick course corrections.” Observations such as these have been around for some time. For instance, Stephan Haeckel’s thoughts on sense and respond organizations and maybe a bit more tangentially the work at the Santa Fe Institute on chaos theory and self organizing systems gave early indications of organizations are facing today. What is enlightening about the Fast Company article is the range of company leaders as practicing flux leadership. They range from Cisco Systems, to the U.S. Army to small entrepreneurial firms.
In the Harvard Business Review article, long recognized authority on change leadership John Kotter begins, “Perhaps the greatest challenge business leaders face today is how to stay competitive amid constant turbulence and disruption.” The tie to Safian’s is clear (to me). While Safian describes the leaders and the environment, Kotter describes the business reality of established firms. The need for operating system of managerial processes, standards and traditional hierarchies are necessary to running a company. He concludes that, “The solution is a second operating system, devoted to the design and implementation of strategy, that uses an agile, network like structure and a very different set of processes.” These two operating systems function complementary to each other. In Kotter’s view, having these two work in concert can be a solution to effectively running the current organization while implementing the change strategy. The shift is from focusing resources on daily operations of doing current business very well to also “constantly seeking competitive advantage without disrupting daily operations.”
Kotter, seems to imply a somewhat new definition of strategy in this age of business turbulence and disruption, “the whole notion of strategy…has to evolve. Strategy should be viewed as a dynamic force that constantly seeks opportunities, identifies initiatives that will capitalize on them, and completes those initiatives swiftly and efficiently.” Kotter goes on to describe his eight-step method and eight accelerators on which his strategy systems runs. Much like Safian’s observations are not new, nor are Kotter’s. The Hammer and Champy’s reengineering movement of the early 1990’s proposes similar approaches and Xerox’s PARC organization is an example from the 1970’s. What Kotter has done a start of how to better link standard business operations to effective adaption to change. How they are applied will be particular to each industry and business.
My next blog entry will make some observations on Safian and Kotter observations and approaches related to the aviation and aerospace industry.
And, all the best for a Happy 2013!!
3 comments on “Leadership and Change”
Latest Comments
- harry inyang on Leadership and Change
- Robert Mansfield on Leadership and Change
- Linda Campbell on Leadership and Change
- Dr. Daryl Watkins on Movin’ On Up
- Jason on Movin’ On Up
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
Subject Matter
Aviation and Aerospace
- Green: The New Color of Manufacturing Dr. Heather Garten
- Innovation, Imagination and Building Your Organization Dr. Kees Rietsema
- Manufacturing Leaders’ Real Estate Savvy Decisions Dr. Heather Garten
- Institutional Isomorphism Dr. Matthew P. Earnhardt
- Aerospace Leadership and Technological Vision: “Toward New Horizons” Dr. Joseph P. Bassi

An article by








Thought provoking article! I have learned from personal experience, the importance of adaptability and flexibility. Going from an executive consulting role for most of my career to an internal staff member has been a real eye opener! The balance between maintaining daily operations while consistently seeking opportunities to grow our student base has certainly been a balancing act. In addition, as an executive coach in a leadership role, I could rally the troops and initiate change within the team much more quickly than in a large organization that must eliminate variation and standardize processes. At the end of the day we must ask ourselves whether we have ACTED like a leader that day and taken the ACTIONS of a leader even if we are not currently in a leadership role.
Thank you for the comment Linda.
As you indicate there are many opportunities and needs for leadership by people who do not hold the organizational position.
Thanks for participating in our Blog!
Bob
Hi Robert,yes I did enjoy your article,it was thought provoking and exciting as well.As a leader myself I find it fasinating and it has added to my knowledge.When you look around the world,there are problems everywhere you go,but thhe question is,why? the simple,but ,difficult to believe answer is failure of leadership.If peoples in leadership position could get it right,infact,half of the world’s problems would have been solves and the world would have been a better place to leave in than what it is right now.thank you and keep it up.